Skip to main content

New World Order - Irish Banking System Collapse - Irish Welcome New World Order To Ireland...

THE Irish banking system would have “totally collapsed” without the Government’s €400 billion crisis guarantee plan, the Tánaiste warned yesterday.

Mary Coughlan made the claim as opposition parties attacked the rescue bid’s “vagueness”.

The enterprise, trade and employment minister insisted failure to act would have tipped Ireland into economic meltdown.

“We would have found ourselves in a different set of circumstances if we had not brought in this legislation. We would have undermined the system of banking and it would have totally collapsed,” she told the Dáil.

Ms Coughlan was responding to demands from Labour leader Eamon Gilmore to explain exactly how much taxpayers were expected to put at risk to cover the rescue plan, and what banks would be charged if they take up the Government’s offer to cover their liabilities.

“This country is being asked to go guarantor for the banks and in effect we are being asked to put up the deeds of the country as security in doing so. “How much are we being asked to guarantee? Figures floating around have ranged from €300 billion to €500bn,” Mr Gilmore said.

The Labour leader ridiculed the Government’s apparent inability to give firm financial answers.

“What are we being asked to guarantee? No member of the House or member of the public would walk into a bank and sign a guarantee for anybody, even a close member of the family, without knowing how much he or she is going to guarantee and would certainly not sign it in circumstances where it was open-ended, with no limit to the guarantee.

We need to know exactly what we are signing up to. It is a blank cheque for the banks,” he added.

Mr Gilmore attacked the Tánaiste for not stating in the legislation how much banks would be charged for getting the state to stand over their business activities.

“The charge applies only if the guarantee is called in. It is like having an insurance policy where one has to pay the premium only on the day one makes a claim. What is this charge and how will it apply?” he asked.

Ms Coughlan, who was standing in for the Taoiseach at Leaders’ Questions while Brian Cowen visited Paris, said there was little risk for the taxpayer, as the assets of the banks involved in the crisis plan were €80bn more than their liabilities.

“Regarding a fee, that is a matter for discussion with the Central Bank, which will determine what the fee will be,” she continued.

“...We are facilitating a guarantee that we hope will never have to be called in,” she said.


Fine Gael leader Enda Kenny expressed concern the Government had not properly thought through the impact of the rescue bid on banks operating in Ireland, but who were not covered by the deal.
Report by Shaun Connolly, Political Correspondent - Irish Examiner.





...So the country is going guarantor for the Irish banks and Central Bank will ultimately decide how much it will charge Ireland???

We are witnessing the demise of Ireland as we know it - the country has effectively been signed away - and without most Irish people even realising it!


...I wonder why the concept of "new world order" for Ireland comes to mind???

Popular posts from this blog

Ireland's Celtic Tiger Excesses...

'Bang twins' may never get to run a business again... POST-boom Ireland is awash with cautionary tales of Celtic Tiger excesses, as a rattle around the carcasses of fallen property developers and entrepreneurs will show. Few can compete with the so-called Bang twins for youth, glamour and tasteful extravagance. Simon and Christian Stokes, the 35-year-old identical twins behind Bang Cafe and exclusive private members club, Residence, saw their entire business go bust with debts of €9m, €3m of which is owed to the tax man. The debt may be in the ha'penny place compared with the eye-watering billions owed by some of their former customers. But their fall has been arguably steeper and more damning than some of the country's richest tycoons. Last week, further humiliation was heaped on them with revelations that even as their businesses were going under, the twins spent €146,000 of company money in 18 months on designer shopping sprees, five star holidays and sumptu

Property Tycoon's Dolce Vita Ends...

Tycoon's dolce vita ends as art seized... THE Dublin city sheriff has seized an art collection and other valuables from the Ailesbury Road home of fallen property developer Bernard McNamara. The collection will be sold to help pay his debts. The sheriff, Brendan Walsh, is believed to have moved against the property developer within the past fortnight, calling to his salubrious Dublin 4 home acting on a court order to seize anything of value from his home to reimburse his creditors. The sheriff is believed to have taken paintings from the family home along with a small number of other items. The development marks a new low for Mr McNamara, once one of Ireland's richest men but who now owes €1.5bn . The property developer and former county councillor from Clare turned the building firm founded by his father Michael into one of the biggest in Ireland. He is the highest-profile former tycoon to date to be targeted by bailiffs, signalling just how far some of Ireland's billionai

I fear a very different kind of property crash

While 80% of people over 40 own their own home just a third of adults under 40 do. This is disastrous for social solidarity and cohesion Changing this system of policymaking requires a government to act in a way that may be uncomfortable for some. Governments have a horizon of no more than five years, and the housing issue requires long-term planning. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was intended to tackle some of these problems. According to its website its remit is to “drive the delivery of better public services, living standards and infrastructure for the people of Ireland by enhancing governance, building capacity and delivering effectively”. So how is the challenge of delivering homes for people in 2024 and beyond going to be met? The extent of the problem is visible in the move by companies, including Ryanair, to buy properties to house staff. Ryanair has, justifiably, defended its right to do so. IPAV has long articulated its views on how to improve supply an