Skip to main content

NAMA €90bn Squandermania

NAMA: The €90bn gamble

Sweeping powers for 'bad bank'
1,400 loans from 50 top developers

THE Government last night gave its 'bad bank' sweeping powers over developers and judges as it unleashed a €90bn plan to rescue banks and kickstart the economy.

But Finance Minister Brian Lenihan admitted it could take up to 30 years for the new National Asset Management Agency (NAMA) to sort out the toxic bank assets.

The State will effectively become one of the biggest property owners in the world as NAMA is granted extensive powers to take over land and development projects from borrowers who are not keeping up with their repayments.

Among the more controversial provisions in the proposed new legislation -- described by Fine Gael as a massive gamble -- is a radical series of rules and procedures to ward off legal attacks that could be disastrous for taxpayers.

But the plans, which include limited appeals to the Supreme Court and a clampdown on injunction proceedings, have alarmed lawyers. They claim that the proposals trample on judicial rights.

Under the new legislation:

* NAMA will take over up to €90bn in risky loans. As the current market value of these loans is far less, NAMA will pay well below this figure.
* The Government will take over 1,400 loans by the end of next June. The top 50 developers will be brought into NAMA before Christmas.
* NAMA will have the power to borrow up to €10bn to help complete projects it takes over -- but only if that development further enhances their value.
* Developers who are in default and whose property has been seized by NAMA will not be allowed to buy back their assets at a later stage.
* builders will not automatically lose their primary homes if they cannot repay their loans.

However, the proposed new legislation does not outline what the full cost of taking over the impaired loans will be.

It will not be possible to work out the full extent of the writedowns until all the €90bn loans have been transferred to NAMA.

The European Commission is expected to rubber-stamp the formula the Government hopes to use to value the loans ahead of the crucial Dail debate on the legislation in early September. Shortly after this, Mr Lenihan then hopes to be able to give an estimate of the discount that the banks will have to take on the loans.

Mr Lenihan unveiled the proposed legislation yesterday, and signalled that it could take 30 years for NAMA to sort out toxic bank assets.

Bulk

He said he expected the bulk of NAMA's work to be done in seven to 10 years, but admitted that some would go on a long time beyond this.

He claimed there was nothing in the proposed bill that would provide a "bail-out" for builders or developers. "Anyone who owes money before NAMA continues to owe it, and is expected to repay the full amount of that debt," he said.

However, the Government now faces a political dogfight to set up the agency as opposition parties highlighted the serious potential pitfalls facing NAMA.

Fine Gael deputy leader and finance spokesman Richard Bruton described NAMA as a "major gamble" that was effectively asking taxpayers to sign a blank cheque.

"The Government are saying 'trust me' on this. I think many people would feel that they don't deserve that." He said that the developers would be left in their "palatial homes", no matter what happened.

Labour's Ruairi Quinn said the Government was asking taxpayers to foot the bill and bear all the risk.

"Despite a figure of €90bn being bandied about, there is nothing in the bill to prevent it going even higher," he said.

The leader of the country's biggest union also declared his opposition to the new agency.

"The bill shows no evidence of new thinking, no willingness to learn from past mistakes and every intention of making ordinary people pay for the squandermania of the rich and powerful," SIPTU's Jack O'Connor said.


Report by Joe Brennan, Senan Molony and Dearbhail McDonald - Irish Independent

Popular posts from this blog

Ireland's Celtic Tiger Excesses...

'Bang twins' may never get to run a business again... POST-boom Ireland is awash with cautionary tales of Celtic Tiger excesses, as a rattle around the carcasses of fallen property developers and entrepreneurs will show. Few can compete with the so-called Bang twins for youth, glamour and tasteful extravagance. Simon and Christian Stokes, the 35-year-old identical twins behind Bang Cafe and exclusive private members club, Residence, saw their entire business go bust with debts of €9m, €3m of which is owed to the tax man. The debt may be in the ha'penny place compared with the eye-watering billions owed by some of their former customers. But their fall has been arguably steeper and more damning than some of the country's richest tycoons. Last week, further humiliation was heaped on them with revelations that even as their businesses were going under, the twins spent €146,000 of company money in 18 months on designer shopping sprees, five star holidays and sumptu

Property Tycoon's Dolce Vita Ends...

Tycoon's dolce vita ends as art seized... THE Dublin city sheriff has seized an art collection and other valuables from the Ailesbury Road home of fallen property developer Bernard McNamara. The collection will be sold to help pay his debts. The sheriff, Brendan Walsh, is believed to have moved against the property developer within the past fortnight, calling to his salubrious Dublin 4 home acting on a court order to seize anything of value from his home to reimburse his creditors. The sheriff is believed to have taken paintings from the family home along with a small number of other items. The development marks a new low for Mr McNamara, once one of Ireland's richest men but who now owes €1.5bn . The property developer and former county councillor from Clare turned the building firm founded by his father Michael into one of the biggest in Ireland. He is the highest-profile former tycoon to date to be targeted by bailiffs, signalling just how far some of Ireland's billionai

I fear a very different kind of property crash

While 80% of people over 40 own their own home just a third of adults under 40 do. This is disastrous for social solidarity and cohesion Changing this system of policymaking requires a government to act in a way that may be uncomfortable for some. Governments have a horizon of no more than five years, and the housing issue requires long-term planning. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was intended to tackle some of these problems. According to its website its remit is to “drive the delivery of better public services, living standards and infrastructure for the people of Ireland by enhancing governance, building capacity and delivering effectively”. So how is the challenge of delivering homes for people in 2024 and beyond going to be met? The extent of the problem is visible in the move by companies, including Ryanair, to buy properties to house staff. Ryanair has, justifiably, defended its right to do so. IPAV has long articulated its views on how to improve supply an