Skip to main content

Don't Blame Us Say Builders!...

Don't blame us for 170,000 house surplus, say builders...



BUILDERS yesterday denied that too many houses went up at the height of the boom -- insisting they built to the demand that existed.

Hubert Fitzpatrick, director of housing and planning services at the Construction Industry Federation (CIF), made the comments after a new report claimed 170,000 more houses were built than were needed during the property bubble.

The organisation is now calling on the Government to conduct a national audit to provide "accurate" data on the number of empty homes.

It argues that a definitive account of the situation has not been presented -- because reports probing the issue are measuring housing stock in different ways.

The latest report into housing published yesterday by University College Dublin (UCD) and Dublin Institute of Technology (DIT) found a total of 345,000 homes -- or 17pc of all housing -- were currently lying empty.

It said that even without considering holiday homes and homes no longer in use, there was still 170,000 houses and apartments surplus to demand.

And it warned that NAMA could prolong the slump by preventing downward price corrections.

Mr Fitzpatrick denied that developers had built far too many houses during the boom.

"Developers built to the demand that existed at the time," he said.

And he told RTE News that builders had not "messed up".

"We acknowledged at the time that building 80,000 to 90,000 houses on an annual basis was not sustainable."

Unsold

The latest housing report differs from the CIF's own figures, which maintain that there are 35,000 to 40,000 new homes remaining unsold.

It also contrasts with figures from the Department of the Environment, which suggest a figure of between 120,000 and 147,000. And National Institute of Regional and Spatial Analysis at NUI Maynooth concluded that 302,625 houses were now uninhabited.

The CIF believes a national audit should be conducted to give a definitive account of the situation.

"There have been four or five reports on this issue and a range of difference between each," a spokesman for the federation said last night.

"There is a need for a report where everyone knows what the framework is and where there is a clear idea of how vacant stock is defined.

"There is a need for a national audit of housing stock. It would be beneficial to do it once and for all."

Yesterday, Housing Minister Michael Finneran also admitted the actual figure of vacant homes may be lower than the UCD/DIT report.

He said a county-by-county calculation of the number of unfinished housing estates was taking place.

Once it was completed, the Department of the Environment, along with local authorities, would decide what could be done to remedy the problem, including the introduction of incentives, said Mr Finneran.

"The figures available to me say there is somewhere between 122,000 and 147,000 vacant properties," he said.

"That's the figure. There are other figures out there. But remember that in any country in the western world there is always an overhang of about 6pc to 7pc."


Report by PATRICIA McDONAGH - Irish Independent

Popular posts from this blog

Ireland's Celtic Tiger Excesses...

'Bang twins' may never get to run a business again... POST-boom Ireland is awash with cautionary tales of Celtic Tiger excesses, as a rattle around the carcasses of fallen property developers and entrepreneurs will show. Few can compete with the so-called Bang twins for youth, glamour and tasteful extravagance. Simon and Christian Stokes, the 35-year-old identical twins behind Bang Cafe and exclusive private members club, Residence, saw their entire business go bust with debts of €9m, €3m of which is owed to the tax man. The debt may be in the ha'penny place compared with the eye-watering billions owed by some of their former customers. But their fall has been arguably steeper and more damning than some of the country's richest tycoons. Last week, further humiliation was heaped on them with revelations that even as their businesses were going under, the twins spent €146,000 of company money in 18 months on designer shopping sprees, five star holidays and sumptu

Property Tycoon's Dolce Vita Ends...

Tycoon's dolce vita ends as art seized... THE Dublin city sheriff has seized an art collection and other valuables from the Ailesbury Road home of fallen property developer Bernard McNamara. The collection will be sold to help pay his debts. The sheriff, Brendan Walsh, is believed to have moved against the property developer within the past fortnight, calling to his salubrious Dublin 4 home acting on a court order to seize anything of value from his home to reimburse his creditors. The sheriff is believed to have taken paintings from the family home along with a small number of other items. The development marks a new low for Mr McNamara, once one of Ireland's richest men but who now owes €1.5bn . The property developer and former county councillor from Clare turned the building firm founded by his father Michael into one of the biggest in Ireland. He is the highest-profile former tycoon to date to be targeted by bailiffs, signalling just how far some of Ireland's billionai

I fear a very different kind of property crash

While 80% of people over 40 own their own home just a third of adults under 40 do. This is disastrous for social solidarity and cohesion Changing this system of policymaking requires a government to act in a way that may be uncomfortable for some. Governments have a horizon of no more than five years, and the housing issue requires long-term planning. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was intended to tackle some of these problems. According to its website its remit is to “drive the delivery of better public services, living standards and infrastructure for the people of Ireland by enhancing governance, building capacity and delivering effectively”. So how is the challenge of delivering homes for people in 2024 and beyond going to be met? The extent of the problem is visible in the move by companies, including Ryanair, to buy properties to house staff. Ryanair has, justifiably, defended its right to do so. IPAV has long articulated its views on how to improve supply an