Skip to main content

Nama Is Biggest Danger To Property Prices...

NAMA is now the biggest danger to property prices...

If one is to take NAMA planners at their word
, a wave of commercial property and development land is set to be unleashed into the Irish market, presumably driving up supply and hammering prices downward.

The original idea of NAMA, that it could hoard properties in ways not open to the banks, seems to be subtly changing. Now the agency is talking about developers rapidly reducing their debts via sales of assets and in less than three years.

The obvious question arises, who is going to buy all the land banks that are going to be unleashed and what will the unleashing do to prices?

One view is -- who cares if prices plunge downward, the market needs to find a price floor at some point. That is all very well, but it is the biggest developers who'll be selling first, the smaller ones will come to the fire sale party late and most likely pay the price, literally.

There is also the concern about overspill into the residential market, where prices are in large measure controlled by the supply of land and the price the builder paid for it.

The following sentence from this week's revised NAMA business plan is likely to be pored over by developers and their advisers, but also by anyone else holding commercial property, and even residential property: "Stabilisation or modest reduction of their debt over the medium term is not sufficient."

This seems to imply that debt repayments by developers must be in some way accelerated via quick sales of assets or refinancing of assets.

With the Irish banks, and foreign lenders, scarred from their last dalliance with the Irish commercial property market, it is hard to see where the refinancing is going to come from and even Anglo is being warned off such deals by no less than the EU Commission.

This is not the only strange requirement NAMA is seeking from the developers. The disclosure that all working capital given to developers to finish projects will be charged at 2.5pc over market interest rates is also baffling.

While nobody wants developers given soft loans, this arrangement would seem to simply exacerbate their debt problems, increasing leverage and making repayment even more unlikely.

Then again this may be the point? Either way it appears the instructions from NAMA chief Brendan McDonagh are 'sell up or get closed down'.

So asset sales it will be, but that is problematic too. Unless a huge amount of foreign money pours into Ireland and boosts demand, prices could take a serious lurch downward when the NAMA properties flood onto the market.

For example, Anglo's customers controlled huge land banks in north Dublin and north Wicklow and such concentrations are likely to also press prices downward if developers are forced to sell.

Of course with prices down 50pc already, yields will be attractive to some overseas funds, but they are buying in prime areas, not sniffing around development land in the wasteland areas off the M50.

Yes NAMA has investment property and much of it is in prime locations, but overall only 30 of NAMA's entire portfolio will be finished investment property, the rest will be raw land, hotels, houses/apartments and half-built developments.

To avoid a double-dip price plunge in Irish property, NAMA could of course foreclose on the properties itself and hoard the assets for a longer timeframe than any developer would be allowed.

But this effectively means asset prices are living on borrowed time and extra supply is simply corralled in the wings until NAMA decides to open the sluice gates.

Would foreign money be that comfortable buying into a market with that kind of uncertainty on supply and demand hanging over it?



Report by Emmet Oliver - Irish Independent

Popular posts from this blog

Ireland's Celtic Tiger Excesses...

'Bang twins' may never get to run a business again... POST-boom Ireland is awash with cautionary tales of Celtic Tiger excesses, as a rattle around the carcasses of fallen property developers and entrepreneurs will show. Few can compete with the so-called Bang twins for youth, glamour and tasteful extravagance. Simon and Christian Stokes, the 35-year-old identical twins behind Bang Cafe and exclusive private members club, Residence, saw their entire business go bust with debts of €9m, €3m of which is owed to the tax man. The debt may be in the ha'penny place compared with the eye-watering billions owed by some of their former customers. But their fall has been arguably steeper and more damning than some of the country's richest tycoons. Last week, further humiliation was heaped on them with revelations that even as their businesses were going under, the twins spent €146,000 of company money in 18 months on designer shopping sprees, five star holidays and sumptu

Property Tycoon's Dolce Vita Ends...

Tycoon's dolce vita ends as art seized... THE Dublin city sheriff has seized an art collection and other valuables from the Ailesbury Road home of fallen property developer Bernard McNamara. The collection will be sold to help pay his debts. The sheriff, Brendan Walsh, is believed to have moved against the property developer within the past fortnight, calling to his salubrious Dublin 4 home acting on a court order to seize anything of value from his home to reimburse his creditors. The sheriff is believed to have taken paintings from the family home along with a small number of other items. The development marks a new low for Mr McNamara, once one of Ireland's richest men but who now owes €1.5bn . The property developer and former county councillor from Clare turned the building firm founded by his father Michael into one of the biggest in Ireland. He is the highest-profile former tycoon to date to be targeted by bailiffs, signalling just how far some of Ireland's billionai

I fear a very different kind of property crash

While 80% of people over 40 own their own home just a third of adults under 40 do. This is disastrous for social solidarity and cohesion Changing this system of policymaking requires a government to act in a way that may be uncomfortable for some. Governments have a horizon of no more than five years, and the housing issue requires long-term planning. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was intended to tackle some of these problems. According to its website its remit is to “drive the delivery of better public services, living standards and infrastructure for the people of Ireland by enhancing governance, building capacity and delivering effectively”. So how is the challenge of delivering homes for people in 2024 and beyond going to be met? The extent of the problem is visible in the move by companies, including Ryanair, to buy properties to house staff. Ryanair has, justifiably, defended its right to do so. IPAV has long articulated its views on how to improve supply an