Skip to main content

Nama Perks For Developers...

Nama 'perks' for builders add to sense of injustice

Developers enjoying allowances on top of huge salaries -- and all at taxpayers' expense...


DEVELOPERS who work for Nama will be entitled to claim expenses and may even stay in their palatial homes as they draw salaries ranging from €70,000 to €200,000, the Sunday Independent can reveal.

Confirmation of the generous allowances being given by the State's so-called 'bad bank' is sure to provoke fresh anger from a public reeling from the revelation by Nama chief executive Brendan McDonagh last Wednesday that his agency has approved salaries of €200,000 for two of its biggest developers.

Appearing before the Dail's Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Mr McDonagh also confirmed Nama's intention to approve salaries ranging from €70,000 to €100,000 a year for between 110 and 120 developers on its books before the end of this year.

Confirmation of the multimillion euro pay bill has unsurprisingly been met with a furious reaction from a public already carrying the massive cost of bailing out the banks that were broken through reckless speculation in the property market.

Asked if it was right that Nama should allow developers to be paid up to €200,000 a year, 89 per cent of those surveyed in the latest Sunday Independent/Quantum Research poll said that they did not. "I think it's totally unfair. Ordinary people are paying for their [developers] mistakes and they are now making huge wages to work in Nama," one female respondent to the poll said.

The news that the developers on Nama's books will also be entitled to claim expenses, and possibly even to stay in the palatial homes they acquired during the boom, is sure to add to this sense of injustice.

Referring to the entitlement of developers to claim expenses, a spokesman for Nama said: "The business plan for their [developers'] business will include resources from the income generated by the business to support the running costs of that business and this will include resources for payments for the key personnel that Nama judges to be necessary for the successful implementation of that plan and other costs including properly vouched for business-related expenses."

Asked if those developers working with Nama would be obliged to trade down from their present homes to more modest properties, the spokesman pointedly declined to say that this would be required in all cases.

"Typically their present homes will be brought into play as part of the business plan and the loan recovery process and trading down and sales of such homes has already begun," the spokesman said.

While such an assurance might go some way towards tempering the anger of hard-pressed taxpayers, Nama's decision to incentivise developers through the payment of a 10 per cent commission on future sales of the assets underpinning their loans will be a harder sell.

Outlining how the commissions will be paid, Mr McDonagh told the PAC that if developers recovered the acquisition price paid by Nama for the loan plus an additional 10 per cent, they would be allowed to keep 10 cent for every euro repaid above that "financial milestone".

The Nama chief again insisted there was no debt forgiveness for developers on the agency's books, saying they were obliged to repay the full €74.2bn owed. But Mr McDonagh readily conceded that achieving full repayment of this amount would not be possible in the current market where property values had fallen by 60 per cent.

He said there was "no pot of gold" beyond the properties securing the loans. "Gratuitous" court actions would be a waste of taxpayers' money if developers had no other money, Mr McDonagh added.

Report by Ronald Quinlan - Sunday Independent

Popular posts from this blog

Ireland's Celtic Tiger Excesses...

'Bang twins' may never get to run a business again... POST-boom Ireland is awash with cautionary tales of Celtic Tiger excesses, as a rattle around the carcasses of fallen property developers and entrepreneurs will show. Few can compete with the so-called Bang twins for youth, glamour and tasteful extravagance. Simon and Christian Stokes, the 35-year-old identical twins behind Bang Cafe and exclusive private members club, Residence, saw their entire business go bust with debts of €9m, €3m of which is owed to the tax man. The debt may be in the ha'penny place compared with the eye-watering billions owed by some of their former customers. But their fall has been arguably steeper and more damning than some of the country's richest tycoons. Last week, further humiliation was heaped on them with revelations that even as their businesses were going under, the twins spent €146,000 of company money in 18 months on designer shopping sprees, five star holidays and sumptu

Property Tycoon's Dolce Vita Ends...

Tycoon's dolce vita ends as art seized... THE Dublin city sheriff has seized an art collection and other valuables from the Ailesbury Road home of fallen property developer Bernard McNamara. The collection will be sold to help pay his debts. The sheriff, Brendan Walsh, is believed to have moved against the property developer within the past fortnight, calling to his salubrious Dublin 4 home acting on a court order to seize anything of value from his home to reimburse his creditors. The sheriff is believed to have taken paintings from the family home along with a small number of other items. The development marks a new low for Mr McNamara, once one of Ireland's richest men but who now owes €1.5bn . The property developer and former county councillor from Clare turned the building firm founded by his father Michael into one of the biggest in Ireland. He is the highest-profile former tycoon to date to be targeted by bailiffs, signalling just how far some of Ireland's billionai

I fear a very different kind of property crash

While 80% of people over 40 own their own home just a third of adults under 40 do. This is disastrous for social solidarity and cohesion Changing this system of policymaking requires a government to act in a way that may be uncomfortable for some. Governments have a horizon of no more than five years, and the housing issue requires long-term planning. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was intended to tackle some of these problems. According to its website its remit is to “drive the delivery of better public services, living standards and infrastructure for the people of Ireland by enhancing governance, building capacity and delivering effectively”. So how is the challenge of delivering homes for people in 2024 and beyond going to be met? The extent of the problem is visible in the move by companies, including Ryanair, to buy properties to house staff. Ryanair has, justifiably, defended its right to do so. IPAV has long articulated its views on how to improve supply an