Skip to main content

Nama Problems...

NAMA ‘won’t solve developer problems’...

THE property, development and construction sectors will not be served by a functioning bank post-NAMA, unless the proposed legislation is amended to provide access to sufficient working capital for new and viable projects, the Construction Industry Federation has said.

Following a meeting of the Construction Industry Federation (CIF) members yesterday director general Tom Parlon outlined serious reservations they have with the whole NAMA scheme.

"The entire NAMA project is predicated on the need to get liquidity flowing again to support the normal economic life of the country, protect jobs and give people a renewed sense of confidence in our collective futures.

"As more details emerge, however, there is a growing sense that NAMA could have the opposite effect by essentially freezing working capital for construction employers and adding to the sense of uncertainty and paralysis that has permeated all aspects of the economy since April’s announcement."

Mr Parlon specifically identified the decision toreduce NAMA’s working capital fund from €10bn to €5bn as a major obstacle to securing the future success of pipeline projects.

"The decision to reduce the figure appears to have been made without the benefit of any evidence whatsoever as to the anticipated working capital requirements of NAMA. In the first instance, working capital is vital in terms of NAMA’s ability to add value to loan portfolios in order to maximise the returns to the Exchequer. It is equally vital in terms of the level ofactivity and output in construction and for the nearly 200,000 employees in the industry."
Mr Parlon said there were risks for distortions in the market arising from NAMA’s monopoly position, and the likelihood for unintended adverse consequences for all property owners and the wider economy resulting from the introduction of an 80% capital gains tax rate in relation to land transactions.
Mr Parlon said the construction sector will be left without commercial banking support post-NAMA.

"The CIF is seriously concerned that NAMA will not act as a functioning bank, which will leave reputable, sound businesses without commercial banking support. The suggestion that the banks will fill this void is ill conceived. Banks will only participate in lending on the basis that they get adequate security/equity in a particular project.

"As NAMA will control all securities and equity, existing experienced borrowers will be excluded from trading in the property and development marketplace.

"This will restrict the market to capital funds and syndicates of non development/construction professionals, which from the construction industry’s perspective contributed in no small measure to the difficulties in which we now find ourselves," Mr Parlon argued.

The CIF boss said this represents a major threat to Ireland’s economic recovery prospects and future sustainable prosperity at a time when international best practice shows us that investment in construction offers the most immediate and effective way of tackling rising unemployment, and is vital in terms of growing the productive capacity of economies.



Reoport - Irish Examiner

Popular posts from this blog

Ireland's Celtic Tiger Excesses...

'Bang twins' may never get to run a business again... POST-boom Ireland is awash with cautionary tales of Celtic Tiger excesses, as a rattle around the carcasses of fallen property developers and entrepreneurs will show. Few can compete with the so-called Bang twins for youth, glamour and tasteful extravagance. Simon and Christian Stokes, the 35-year-old identical twins behind Bang Cafe and exclusive private members club, Residence, saw their entire business go bust with debts of €9m, €3m of which is owed to the tax man. The debt may be in the ha'penny place compared with the eye-watering billions owed by some of their former customers. But their fall has been arguably steeper and more damning than some of the country's richest tycoons. Last week, further humiliation was heaped on them with revelations that even as their businesses were going under, the twins spent €146,000 of company money in 18 months on designer shopping sprees, five star holidays and sumptu

Property Tycoon's Dolce Vita Ends...

Tycoon's dolce vita ends as art seized... THE Dublin city sheriff has seized an art collection and other valuables from the Ailesbury Road home of fallen property developer Bernard McNamara. The collection will be sold to help pay his debts. The sheriff, Brendan Walsh, is believed to have moved against the property developer within the past fortnight, calling to his salubrious Dublin 4 home acting on a court order to seize anything of value from his home to reimburse his creditors. The sheriff is believed to have taken paintings from the family home along with a small number of other items. The development marks a new low for Mr McNamara, once one of Ireland's richest men but who now owes €1.5bn . The property developer and former county councillor from Clare turned the building firm founded by his father Michael into one of the biggest in Ireland. He is the highest-profile former tycoon to date to be targeted by bailiffs, signalling just how far some of Ireland's billionai

I fear a very different kind of property crash

While 80% of people over 40 own their own home just a third of adults under 40 do. This is disastrous for social solidarity and cohesion Changing this system of policymaking requires a government to act in a way that may be uncomfortable for some. Governments have a horizon of no more than five years, and the housing issue requires long-term planning. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was intended to tackle some of these problems. According to its website its remit is to “drive the delivery of better public services, living standards and infrastructure for the people of Ireland by enhancing governance, building capacity and delivering effectively”. So how is the challenge of delivering homes for people in 2024 and beyond going to be met? The extent of the problem is visible in the move by companies, including Ryanair, to buy properties to house staff. Ryanair has, justifiably, defended its right to do so. IPAV has long articulated its views on how to improve supply an