Skip to main content

EU Profits From Ireland's Crisis...

EU loan is no bailout, it's financial bullying.

Should we be taking our case on the EC's extortionate profit margin to the Court of Justice...

SOME members of the European Council are exploiting our crisis in order to profit at our expense. If the interest rates on the EU loans are not reduced, the Irish public will suffer unnecessarily while our European partners profit from these loans.

Last January, the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism charged Ireland an interest rate of 5.51 per cent for money that it borrowed at 2.59 per cent. A month later, the European Financial Stabilisation Fund charged Ireland an interest rate of 5.9 per cent for money that it borrowed at 2.89 per cent. On this basis, the EFSF earns a profit margin of 3.01 per cent and the EFSM earns a profit margin of 2.93 per cent.

These margins are draconian. The majority of the interest that Ireland pays is not used to pay for the EU's borrowing costs. It is excessive profit for the countries that are lending us money. For every €1m that Ireland pays in interest costs, Ireland must pay another €1.08m so that our EU partners make a profit. This, clearly, is not a bailout. It is exploiting our vulnerability. It is financial bullying.

The IMF is dreaded because of its reputation of treating countries harshly. Nevertheless, the IMF is charging Ireland an interest rate of 4.34 per cent. This rate is far lower than that being charged by our European partners.

The IMF loans are partially in euro, sterling, dollars and yen. The cost of hedging against exchange rate risks has brought the effective interest rate up to 5.2 per cent but there are no such costs associated with loans from the EU as all loans are in euro.

Therefore, the interest rate on the loans from the EU should be compared with the 4.34 per cent rate being charged by the IMF.

By contrast, it is plain to see that the interest rates being charged on loans from the European Union are unjust and unfair. They will add unnecessary hardship onto the Irish people in order to enrich our partners in Europe.

When the loans are fully drawn down, the profit margin charged to Ireland will be €1.3bn per annum.

Put another way, in addition to paying for the EU's borrowing costs, Ireland will be paying a further €1.3bn of pure profit to our partners in Europe.

Let's translate the misery that this €1.3bn bill will inflict on the Irish people. Ireland's austerity measures have been the most severe in any advanced economy during a recession in the past 30 years. Tax increases and social welfare cuts have squeezing families' incomes to the point where a third of the population now has a disposable income of less than €70 a month.

An annual transfer of €1.3bn from Irish taxpayers to European governments is a huge additional burden for a country already stretch on the rack.

€1.3 billion equates to:

- Three times the €420m raised by the changes to the Universal Social Charge introduced in December's Budget.

- A third higher than the €1bn saved by reducing public sector wages in Budget 2010.

- Three times the €370m reduction in child benefit in Budget 2010 and Budget 2011.

- One and a half times the €822mn reduction in social welfare payments in Budget 2010 and Budget 2011.

- Almost the €1.4bin saved from the introduction of the public sector pension levy.

€1.3bn is in excess of one per cent of Ireland's national income.

To put this into scale, it would be the equivalent of charging Germany a profit margin of €26bn per annum and the equivalent of charging France a profit margin of €21bn per annum.

The European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism was established under Article 122 of the Lisbon Treaty. This allows the European Council to grant financial assistance to member-states in difficulty "in a spirit of solidarity". Charging such an extortionate profit margin on top of the interest rate is stretching this principle to breaking point.

There is no solidarity in charging Ireland over €2m for every €1m it costs Europe to borrow money.

There is no solidarity in insisting on earning a profit of €1.3bn annually from Ireland after we have been hit with the greatest financial crisis in Europe's history.

There is no solidarity in forcing Ireland to raise taxes, slash wages and cut social welfare in order to pay billions of euro in profit to the rest of Europe.

There is no solidarity in profiteering from Ireland's misfortune and hardship.

Should we be asking the Attorney General on the legal status of this issue? Is the European Council in breach of the Lisbon Treaty? If so, then the next logical step would be to present our case to the European Court of Justice.


Article by Peter Mathews (Fine Gael TD) - Sunday Independent

Popular posts from this blog

Ireland's Celtic Tiger Excesses...

'Bang twins' may never get to run a business again... POST-boom Ireland is awash with cautionary tales of Celtic Tiger excesses, as a rattle around the carcasses of fallen property developers and entrepreneurs will show. Few can compete with the so-called Bang twins for youth, glamour and tasteful extravagance. Simon and Christian Stokes, the 35-year-old identical twins behind Bang Cafe and exclusive private members club, Residence, saw their entire business go bust with debts of €9m, €3m of which is owed to the tax man. The debt may be in the ha'penny place compared with the eye-watering billions owed by some of their former customers. But their fall has been arguably steeper and more damning than some of the country's richest tycoons. Last week, further humiliation was heaped on them with revelations that even as their businesses were going under, the twins spent €146,000 of company money in 18 months on designer shopping sprees, five star holidays and sumptu...

I fear a very different kind of property crash

While 80% of people over 40 own their own home just a third of adults under 40 do. This is disastrous for social solidarity and cohesion Changing this system of policymaking requires a government to act in a way that may be uncomfortable for some. Governments have a horizon of no more than five years, and the housing issue requires long-term planning. The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was intended to tackle some of these problems. According to its website its remit is to “drive the delivery of better public services, living standards and infrastructure for the people of Ireland by enhancing governance, building capacity and delivering effectively”. So how is the challenge of delivering homes for people in 2024 and beyond going to be met? The extent of the problem is visible in the move by companies, including Ryanair, to buy properties to house staff. Ryanair has, justifiably, defended its right to do so. IPAV has long articulated its views on how to improve supply an...

Property Tycoon's Dolce Vita Ends...

Tycoon's dolce vita ends as art seized... THE Dublin city sheriff has seized an art collection and other valuables from the Ailesbury Road home of fallen property developer Bernard McNamara. The collection will be sold to help pay his debts. The sheriff, Brendan Walsh, is believed to have moved against the property developer within the past fortnight, calling to his salubrious Dublin 4 home acting on a court order to seize anything of value from his home to reimburse his creditors. The sheriff is believed to have taken paintings from the family home along with a small number of other items. The development marks a new low for Mr McNamara, once one of Ireland's richest men but who now owes €1.5bn . The property developer and former county councillor from Clare turned the building firm founded by his father Michael into one of the biggest in Ireland. He is the highest-profile former tycoon to date to be targeted by bailiffs, signalling just how far some of Ireland's billionai...